Color calibration mac vs pc
If you have a point you disagree with me on, kindly state your thoughts and your experiences and share with the rest of the readers. But if your fingers are itching to type something nasty, please keep it to yourself or vent someplace else : Thank you for understanding! Before we dive into the really important points, let me first talk about something many of us would consider ridiculous — the unboxing experience.
Traditionally, PCs and PC components have never exciting to unwrap and unbox, as that was never really the focus of manufacturers. Computer parts would be shipped in ugly, brown carton boxes and if you were lucky to find a neatly printed manual among disposable plastic-wrapped pieces, you would be happy. Apple has always been about delivering the experience, and it starts with the packaging.
The darn box that contains an Apple product is beautiful to start with! Then as you start unboxing the contents, you realize that everything has been thought-out design-wise not only from the product, but also from the packaging standpoint. And this experience is mirrored on every product — whether you are opening an iPhone case or a big iMac box. Everything is beautifully and tightly organized, and even simple things like protective plastic look so strangely beautiful.
Simple, elegant, brilliant. And it sure as hell works! The idea of starting the excitement from the moment one opens the box has been such a huge marketing success for Apple, that everyone has been trying to copy that ever since! Apple really paved the way to make packaging look sexy, and today, so many other products now have similarly beautiful and shiny boxes, colorful manuals, neatly stacked box contents and the simple, yet elegant design.
Before you begin
Yup, through its products, Apple has placed a subliminal message into our brains, which makes us perceive a product higher when it is packaged beautifully. Who would have thought that packaging would have played such a key role in assessing product quality? Which platform has better hardware, PC or Mac? So at the end of the day, there is no underlying hardware difference in terms of raw power — both PCs and Macs are equally capable systems. However, there is one disadvantage to Macs — they are manufactured by a single company, while the PC world is comprised of tens of thousands of manufacturers of all sizes.
Actually, let me rephrase that: Apple does not really manufacture hardware components. It finds the components it needs and buys them, or works with specific manufacturers on making components that are designed specifically for Macs. Once design is complete, Apple has manufacturing partners like Foxconn China , who then manufacture those parts specifically for Apple. Product assembly then takes place at a different facility, which can potentially be owned by the same manufacturer.
Aside from the motherboard, the Fusion drive, some Apple-specific hardware components and exterior cases, all other components are purchased from standard PC component manufacturers. Even the panels that Apple puts into its Retina screens and monitors are made by companies like Samsung, which also manufacture similar components for the PC market.
- Subscribe to RSS.
- mac os x install dvd snow leopard!
- How to Calibrate Your Monitor on Windows or Mac.
- How to calibrate your monitor!
- Calibrate Display – Mac.
- How to Calibrate Your Monitor in Windows and OS X.
So why is this a disadvantage to Macs? When something new comes out, it can be pretty much instantly available in the PC world. With companies focusing on specific components rather than the entire machine, new computer parts can flood the market right after the product is launched.
PC vs Mac for Photography
In the case of Apple, things cannot take place that quickly. Product redesign, integration, firmware development and testing all take time to properly execute. No other Macs, including the MacBook Pro, have been refreshed yet and it will probably take some time for the entire line of products to get the latest and greatest CPUs.
While hardware is extremely important in terms of performance, the marriage of hardware and software for a fluid, stable system is even more important. How good is hardware, if the software is buggy or cannot keep up? One key advantage of Apple is their excellent integration of hardware and software, which without a doubt, has played a huge role in the success of Apple products. Macs are often regarded as more stable than PCs mainly for this reason. And it is true: it is so much easier to take control of software and hardware integration when you only need to deal with few hardware suppliers and components.
In short, dedicated hardware always wins. With PCs, you are dealing with several CPU manufacturers, dozens of motherboard manufacturers that offer different models with different feature-sets and the list goes on and on with all other components, which all have to be able to talk to each other nicely at the end of the day. Once you put it all together, then you deal with software, which is often the root cause of stability issues.
Buggy drivers, buggy firmware and sometimes incompatible hardware can be pretty frustrating to deal with for an average user. Apple products generally do not have such problems. The motherboards are carefully designed to work with the chosen hardware components and everything is cherry-picked to perform the best for that platform. Once components are put together, drivers and firmware are optimized for that specific hardware, so one does not have to deal with third party drivers or support. As a result, you end up with a more stable system and less hardware and software integration headaches to worry about in the long term.
As PC users, we are used to running periodic driver updates, firmware updates and operating system updates. Mac users rarely go through the same hassles, because software, firmware and driver updates are delivered in a single update package. There are no independent components from third party manufacturers to be hassled with.
How to Calibrate Your Monitor | Digital Trends
Does this make Macs better than PCs? As you may already know, Microsoft has been putting a lot of resources into hardware manufacturing with its Microsoft Surface and Surface Book lines of laptops. In my opinion, with this move, Microsoft will be a direct competitor and potentially a direct competitor for Apple in the future, since Microsoft is following exactly the same methodology of successfully coupling hardware and software together. Just like Apple, Microsoft can optimize its drivers and operating system to work well with the carefully chosen hardware, delivering rock-solid stability.
What about the underlying software that talks directly to computer hardware, the Operating System? So that in itself can be considered to be an advantage for PCs — freedom to choose any operating system without any concerns. Thus, at the end of the day, it is basically the battle of Windows vs Mac OS. So which operating system is better and more stable? This is one area where Apple fans will defend their territory big time. If one is able to get solid hardware with well-tested drivers, Microsoft Windows is a very stable and reliable operating system.
Unless you have serious hardware issues or nasty viruses more on viruses below , you should never be seeing errors! True, Microsoft has had its share of bad days. We all had our good laugh that day and we have seen many more failures afterwards too. Windows Millennium ME was a total disaster. Few people liked Vista and Windows 8 did not get much love either.
I was on a beta-testing team when Microsoft launched Windows and since the day the OS got a complete overhaul, with the underlying kernel running on NT code, Microsoft Windows has been a solid and a reliable operating system. All the instability issues we have seen have been the result of poor software and hardware integration, which Microsoft started to tackle later on with signed drivers. Still, it is nearly impossible to get every hardware vendor to integrate well with all components of software — the biggest challenge for any OS maker.
How to Calibrate a Monitor for Photography
So if your experience with Windows OS has been bad, you most likely had some serious hardware or software compatibility issues. However, that only applies to the operating system layer and the basic, OS-provided applications — the same does not apply to third party applications. Just in the past 6 months, I have seen many cases of all kinds of software crashes on the iMac Retina that I have been using. In short, crap software will be crap on any machine, whether it is a PC or a Mac.
Nope, not true. It sucks resources and wastes memory on my PC and it is no different on my iMac. When doing our first video project , I thought that doing editing on my iMac would be a good idea. After just a few hours and dozens of application errors and shutdowns, I ended up moving the project back to my PC — it was simply unbearable.
In this particular case, I was better off working on my PC than on the iMac! I was still experiencing occasional crashes, but there were nearly not as bad. Adobe later pushed a few updates to take care of these stability issues, but it was already too late — I did not want to trust the Mac to run any Adobe apps reliably.
In summary, there are no serious differences in operating systems in my opinion. Both Windows and Mac OS are equally reliable. What about virus and trojan outbreaks? We hear about this one a lot too, with Apple fans arguing that Apple machines suffer from much less software and hardware exploit issues. This one I have to agree on — and the main reason is popularity.
Simply put, there are far more PCs out there to target compared to Macs. For mass-hacking and denial of service attacks, the more machines in the inventory, the better. So naturally, PCs would be better targets, as they have the volume. With the rise of Apple machines and gadgets, more and more hackers are targeting Macs.
Both require elevated privileges for installing software, both prohibit easy launching of downloaded files, and operating system files are protected from modifications. Back in the day, Apple fans could brag on Mac OS being based on the more stable Unix platform, but that argument is a moot point for me personally. Apple makes beautiful products and sadly, I cannot think of a single PC that is as aesthetically as pleasing as a Mac. When was the last time you saw a truly beautiful PC? PC manufacturers have tried every possible design and the result is sadly one ugliness after another.
These can be beautiful, simple and sleek to use.
josip-debeljuh.from.hr/sitemap6.xml But in all honesty, none still beat the aesthetics of Apple products. Another area Apple is very strong at is ergonomics. The idea of a simplistic design also equally applies to navigation and use of both hardware and software components.
- menu bar icon mac programming.
- Accessing “Expert Mode” Screen Color Calibrator in Mac OS X (Mojave, Sierra & El Capitan).
- Using a hardware color calibrator?
After using the iMac, I have to say, nobody has the trackpad in the PC world figured out when compared to Apple. In fact, all PC trackpads suck badly. Every laptop trackpad I have used to date has been junk — very frustrating to use, even on the latest, most expensive machines.